Anandya Zulham Valensyah

Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (ITS) Surabaya

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19184/jobc.v5i2.6164 

ABSTRACT 

This study investigates a multi-layer filtration column consisting of sand, zeolite, and activated carbon for reducing Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) in methyl ester fractionation wastewater. Pilot-scale experiments were conducted at a flow rate of 1.5 m³·h-¹, resulting in an Empty-Bed Contact Time (EBCT) of only 2.31 seconds. Under this short residence time, the system achieved limited single-pass COD reductions ranging from 0.308% to 0.424%, with an average of 0.356%. A first-order kinetic model predicted a theoretical removal of 0.1815%, which is within the same order of magnitude as the experimental results. This alignment confirms that contact time is the primary limiting factor in system performance. Minor differences between theoretical and measured values may result from variations in activated carbon, first-break flow, and analytical uncertainty. The results indicate that the current configuration is insufficient for achieving meaningful COD removal under the tested operating conditions. Substantial improvement would require increasing EBCT, adding more activated carbon, or redesigning the system into multiple stages. The findings provide quantitative guidance for scaling and optimizing filtration-based pretreatment for industrial wastewater applications.

Keywords: multi-stage filtration, COD reduction, biodiesel wastewater treatment, zeolite, activated carbon, silica sand

REFERENCES

[1] Wang S, Peng Y. Natural zeolites as effective adsorbents in water and wastewater treatment. Chem Eng J. 2010;156(1):11–24.

[2] Encinar JM, Gonzales JF, Rodríguez-Reinares A. Biodiesel from used frying oil: Variables affecting the yields and characteristics of the biodiesel. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2005;44(15):5492–9.

[3] Najib NWM, Mohammed TA, Sulaiman MH, Awang ZB. Effect of filter media characteristics on the performance of sand filters. J Water Process Eng. 2020;37:101401.

[4] Sontheimer H, Crittenden J, Summers R. Activated Carbon for Water Treatment. Lancaster: Technomic Publishing; 1988.

[5] Huang Y, Zhang S, Wang L, Wang S. Removal of COD from wastewater by ion-exchange using natural zeolite. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018;25(10):9574–82.

[6] Kholif MA, El-Din GAMN, Zayed MF, Soliman RM, Abdelrahman H. Removal of BOD₅ and COD from domestic wastewater by using a multi-media-layering (MML) system. Environ Nat Resour J. 2023;21:534–44.

[7] APHA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Washington DC: American Public Health Association; latest edition.

[8] Tchobanoglous G, Stensel HD, Tsuchihashi R, Burton FL. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2014.

[9] Misaelides P. Application of natural zeolites in environmental remediation: A short review. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2011;144(1–3):15–8.

[10] Hedström A. Ion exchange of ammonium in zeolites: A literature review. J Environ Eng. 2001;127(8):673–81.

[11] Tian Y, Chen L, Wang J, Li H, Li Y. Application of activated carbon in treatment of industrial wastewater. J Environ Sci (China). 2008;20(3):327–32.

[12] Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., G. Tchobanoglous, H. D. Stensel, R. Tsuchihashi, and J. Kuo. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery, 5th ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill Education, 2014.

[13] R. M. Crittenden, J. C. Montgomery, and J. L. Hand, Water Treatment: Principles and Design, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2012.

[14] M. J. Snoeyink and D. Jenkins, Water Chemistry. New York, NY, USA: Wiley, 1980.

[15] W. J. Weber Jr. and J. C. Morris, “Kinetics of adsorption on carbon from solution,”J. Sanit. Eng. Div., ASCE, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 31–60, 1963.

[16] H. S. Fogler, Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering, 5th ed. Boston, MA, USA: Pearson, 2016.

[17] APHA, AWWA, and WEF, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 23rd ed. Washington, DC, USA: APHA, 2017.