Mizanurafi’ Ghifarhadi Prasiefa
Department of Chemical Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia
PT. Surya Pamenang, Kediri 64182, Indonesia

Mohammad Nazarudin Ali
PT. Aneka Jasa Grhadika, Gresik 61119, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19184/jobc.v6i1.60002

ABSTRACT
Anaerobic co-digestion (AcoD) of livestock manure is widely recognized for enhancing biogas production; however, its performance is governed by complex interactions between substrate characteristics, microbial consortia, and reactor configurations, which are often addressed separately in existing reviews. This study provides an integrated assessment of manure-based AcoD by linking microbial dynamics, feedstock variability, and technological design to identify key factors controlling methane (CH4) yield and process stability. Mono- digestion is frequently limited by imbalanced C/N ratios and ammonia (NH3) inhibition, whereas co-digestion with plant-based substrates improves nutrient balance and promotes microbial synergy. The AD process involves four stages—hydrolysis, acidogenesis, acetogenesis, and methanogenesis–driven by bacteria (Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes) and methanogenic archaea (Methanoculleus, Methanosarcina), whose activity is strongly influenced by operating conditions. Various livestock manures, including cow/cattle, bovine, sheep, goat, llama, pig/swine, buffalo, horse, donkey, deer, camel, duck, rabbit, chicken, poultry, fish, shrimp, as well as human waste, have been tested under different co-digestion conditions with plant-derived feedstocks. Across various manure types and co-digestion systems, CH4 content ranges from 46–78%, with yields up to 8905 ± 70.7 mL CH4/g-VS under optimized conditions. This review highlights that optimizing parameters such as the C/N ratio (25–30:1), temperature (35–55 °C), and organic loading rate (OLR), along with appropriate reactor selection and microbial management, is critical to maximizing performance. Despite these advances, challenges related to NH3 inhibition, feedstock variability, and scale-up remain. Future work should focus on integrated system design, real-time monitoring, and cost-effective process optimization to support the large-scale implementation of manure-based AcoD.

Keywords: biogas production, co-digestion, digester technologies, livestock manure, renewable energy

REFERENCES

[1]  T. Tan, Z. Zhang, Z. Huang, et al., 2025. Evaluating the nutrient and pollutant flows of the Chinese livestock manure management system from 1949 to 2050. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 215, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.108092

[2]  P. Echeverria-Paredes and S.H. Mood, 2025. Biomass thermo-chemical products. Biomass thermo-chemical products., in: , Thermochemical Conversion of Lignocellulosic Materials: Theory, Design, and Applications for the Future, Elsevier, pp., 649–697https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95551-5.00016-2
doi.org/10.19184/jobc.v6.i1.60002

[3]  M. Zilio, A. Pigoli, B. Rizzi, et al., 2021. Measuring ammonia and odours emissions during full field digestate use in agriculture. Science of the Total Environment. 782, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146882

[4]  A. Schnürer, 2016. Biogas Production: Microbiology and Technology. Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology. 156, pp., 195–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2016_5

[5]  Z. Zheng, Y. Cai, Y. Zhang, et al., 2021. The effects of C/N (10–25) on the relationship of substrates, metabolites, and microorganisms in “inhibited steady-state” of anaerobic digestion. Water Research. 188, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116466

[6]  R.M. Ahmad, S. Javied, A. Aslam, et al., 2024. Optimizing Biogas Production and Digestive Stability through Waste Co-Digestion. Sustainability (Switzerland) . 16, https://doi.org/10.3390/su16073045

[7]  H.M. Wu, X. Li, J.N. Chen, et al., 2025. Food Waste Anaerobic Digestion Under High Organic Loading Rate: Inhibiting Factors, Mechanisms, and Mitigation Strategies. Processes. 13, https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13072090

[8]  N. Adouani, M.N. Pons, R. Hreiz, and S. Pacaud, 2016. Dynamic modelling of an anaerobic digester for wastes at the territory level. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 49, pp., 1169– 1174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.361

[9]  D. Slisane, F. Romagnoli, A. Kamenders, I. Veidenbergs, and D. Blumberga, 2015. Co- digestion of algae biomass for production of biogas and fertilizer: Life cycle cost analysis. Vide. Tehnologija. Resursi - Environment, Technology, Resources. 2, pp., 284– 288. https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2015vol2.627

[10]  Y. Nleya, B. Young, E. Nooraee, and S. Baroutian, 2023. Opportunities and Challenges for Anaerobic Digestion of Farm Dairy Effluent. ChemBioEng Reviews. 10, pp., 924– 940. https://doi.org/10.1002/cben.202300021

[11]  S.J. Grimberg, D. Hilderbrandt, M. Kinnunen, and S. Rogers, 2015. Anaerobic digestion of food waste through the operation of a mesophilic two-phase pilot scale digester - Assessment of variable loadings on system performance. Bioresource Technology. 178, pp., 226–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.001

[12]  Z. Yin, S. Zhou, X. Zhang, et al., 2023. A Novel Batched Four-Stage–Two-Phase Anaerobic Digestion System to Facilitate Methane Production from Rice Straw and Cow Manure with Low Inoculum/Substrate Ratios. Fermentation. 9, https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9060565

[13]  S. Aslanzadeh, K. Rajendran, A. Jeihanipour, and M.J. Taherzadeh, 2013. The effect of effluent recirculation in a semi-continuous two-stage anaerobic digestion system. Energies. 6, pp., 2966–2981. https://doi.org/10.3390/en6062966

[14]  R. Ganesh, M. Torrijos, P. Sousbie, et al., 2014. Single-phase and two-phase anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable waste: Comparison of start-up, reactor stability and process performance. Waste Management. 34, pp., 875–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.02.023

[15]  E. Angelonidi and S.R. Smith, 2015. A comparison of wet and dry anaerobic digestion processes for the treatment of municipal solid waste and food waste. Water and Environment Journal. 29, pp., 549–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12130

[16]  F. Di Maria, M. Barratta, F. Bianconi, P. Placidi, and D. Passeri, 2017. Solid anaerobic digestion batch with liquid digestate recirculation and wet anaerobic digestion of organic waste: Comparison of system performances and identification of microbial guilds. Waste Management. 59, pp., 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.039

[17]  Y. Shapovalov, S. Zhadan, G. Bochmann, A. Salyuk, and V. Nykyforov, 2020. Dry anaerobic digestion of chicken manure: A review. Applied Sciences (Switzerland). 10, pp., 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217825

[18]  J. Wu, H. Zhang, Y. Zhao, X. Yuan, and Z. Cui, 2023. Characteristics of Biogas Production Activity and Microbial Community during Sub-Moderate Temperature Anaerobic Digestion of Wastewater. Fermentation. 9, https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9100903

[19]  A.K. Singh, P.K. Srivastava, A.S.K. Sinha, and G.N. Tiwari, 2023. An estimation of bio- methane generation from photovoltaic thermal compound parabolic concentrator (PVT- CPC) integrated fixed dome biogas digester. Biosystems Engineering. 227, pp., 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2023.01.017

[20]  G.A.W. Sudiartha and T. Imai, 2022. An Investigation of Temperature Downshift Influences on Anaerobic Digestion in the Treatment of Municipal Wastewater Sludge. Journal of Water and Environment Technology. 20, pp., 154–167. https://doi.org/10.2965/jwet.22-056 

[21]  J. Kainthola, A.S. Kalamdhad, and V. V. Goud, 2020. Optimization of process parameters for accelerated methane yield from anaerobic co-digestion of rice straw and food waste. Renewable Energy. 149, pp., 1352–1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.10.124

[22]  M. Zieliński, M. Dębowski, M. Kisielewska, et al., 2019. Cavitation-based pretreatment strategies to enhance biogas production in a small-scale agricultural biogas plant. Energy for Sustainable Development. 49, pp., 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2018.12.007

[23]  M.A. Kucuker, B. Demirel, and T.T. Onay, 2020. Enhanced biogas production from chicken manure via enzymatic pretreatment. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management. 22, pp., 1521–1528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-020-01039-w

[24]  M.G. Prasiefa and S. Zullaikah, 2025. Effect of Different Operating Conditions on Tobacco Stem Pyrolysis and Impregnation for Further Controlled Release Fertiliser Application. Materials Science Forum. 1154, pp., 79–84. https://doi.org/10.4028/P- 2BYN6B

[25]  F.L.F. Bittencourt and M. Ferreira Martins, 2025. Thermochemical treatment of human excreta to energy and biochar: recent advances, applications, and future directions. Thermochemical treatment of human excreta to energy and biochar: recent advances, applications, and future directions., in: , Biochar for Environmental Remediation: Principles, Applications, and Prospects, Elsevier, pp., 329– 343https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99889-5.00017-7 

[26]  H.G. Katariya and H.P. Patolia, 2023. Methane enrichment in biogas by using aqueous solutions of alkaline salts. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. 13, pp., 7947–7953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01590-y

[27]  D. Andriani, A. Rajani, Kusnadi, et al., 2020. A review on biogas purification through hydrogen sulphide removal. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 483, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/483/1/012034

[28]  A. Bondar, T. Pidpala, G. Danylchuk, and L. Onyshchenko, 2025. Influence of the type of livestock by-products on biogas yield and composition. Animal Science and Food Technology. 16, pp., 55–73. https://doi.org/10.31548/animal.1.2025.55

[29]  R. Dalpaz, O. Konrad, C. Cândido da Silva Cyrne, et al., 2020. Using biogas for energy cogeneration: An analysis of electric and thermal energy generation from agro-industrial waste. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 40, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2020.100774

[30]  B. Radetic, 2024. Cogeneration in anaerobic sludge digestion, biogas pretreatment, desulfurization, and utilization. Cogeneration in anaerobic sludge digestion, biogas pretreatment, desulfurization, and utilization., in: , Handbook of Water and Used Water Purification, Springer International Publishing, pp., 775– 793https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78000-9_47

[31]  C.M.B. Gomes, C.T. Do Nascimento, R.A. Schaffner, et al., 2025. FROM SAMPLING TO PURIFICATION: METHODOLOGIES AND TECHNIQUES FOR EVALUATION OF SILOXANES IN BIOGAS[DA AMOSTRAGEM À PURIFICAÇÃO: METODOLOGIAS E TÉCNICAS PARA AVALIAÇÃO DE SILOXANOS NO BIOGÁS]. Quimica Nova. 48, https://doi.org/10.21577/0100-4042.20250093

[32]  M. Struk, I. Kushkevych, and M. Vítězová, 2020. Biogas upgrading methods: recent advancements and emerging technologies. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology. 19, pp., 651–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-020-09539-9

[33]  B. Aghel, S. Behaein, S. Wongwises, and M.S. Shadloo, 2022. A review of recent progress in biogas upgrading: With emphasis on carbon capture. Biomass and Bioenergy. 160, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106422

[34]  K. Subramanian and K. Suresh, 2024. Metabolic and Biochemical Pathways for Anaerobic Digestion. Metabolic and Biochemical Pathways for Anaerobic Digestion., in: , Microorganisms for Sustainability, Springer, pp., 3–25https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 981-97-4159-5_1

[35]  A.A. Rajput and Z. Sheikh, 2019. Effect of inoculum type and organic loading on biogas production of sunflower meal and wheat straw. Sustainable Environment Research. 1, https://doi.org/10.1186/s42834-019-0003-x

[36]  M. Boland and J. Cheng, 2021. Metagenomics reveals microbiome changes with lignocelluloses biomass addition in anaerobic co-digesters treating swine wastewater. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting, ASABE 2021. 2, pp., 791–800. https://doi.org/10.13031/aim.202100266

[37]  B. Najafi and S. Faizollahzadeh Ardabili, 2018. Application of ANFIS, ANN, and logistic methods in estimating biogas production from spent mushroom compost (SMC). Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 133, pp., 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.02.025

[38]  Y. Chen, Q. Ping, D. Li, X. Dai, and Y. Li, 2022. Comprehensive insights into the impact of pretreatment on anaerobic digestion of waste active sludge from perspectives of organic matter composition, thermodynamics, and multi-omics. Water Research. 226, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.119240

[39]  N.A. Wardani, N. Afiqah, M.M. Azis, and W. Budhijanto, 2020. Comparison of Biogas Productivity in Thermophilic and Mesophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Bioethanol Liquid Waste. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 448, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/448/1/012002

[40]  I. Lanko, J. Hejnic, J. Říhová-Ambrožová, I. Ferrer, and P. Jenicek, 2021. Digested sludge quality in mesophilic, thermophilic and temperature-phased anaerobic digestion systems. Water (Switzerland). 13, https://doi.org/10.3390/w13202839

[41]  A.A. Arslan, Ş.Ö. Altınçekiç, E.B. Çarpıcı, et al., 2024. Effect of Different OLR and Mixture Ratios on Biogas Production Using Goat Dung and Maize Silage. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering. 458 LNCE, pp., 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031- 51579-8_11

[42]  N.E.H. Chaher, A. Nassour, M. Hamdi, and M. Nelles, 2021. Monitoring of food waste anaerobic digestion performance: conventional co-substrates vs. Unmarketable biochar additions. Foods. 10, https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10102353

[43]  A. Dymchuk, N. Shcherbatiuk, N. Pustova, L. Ponko, and R. Yamborak, 2025. Bioconversion of livestock by-products into biogas: Experimental study of optimal fermentation conditions[Біоконверсія побічних продуктів тваринництва в біогаз: експериментальне дослідження оптимальних умов ферментації]. Scientific Horizons. 28, pp., 80–89. https://doi.org/10.48077/scihor3.2025.80

[44]  O. Achouri, K. Derbal, M. Bennecer, et al., 2025. Comparison of anaerobic digestion of various food and non-food wastes: impact of inoculum source on biogas production. Biofuels. https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2025.2477866

[45]  L. Du, J. Liang, P. Yang, W. Gao, and K. Zhang, 2014. Influence of total solid content on anaerobic digestion of swine manure and kinetic analysis. Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering. 30, pp., 246– 251. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2014.24.030

[46]  A. Goel, Manu, and S. Gupta, 2007. Biogas from organic waste diluted with sugar mill waste water. Asian Journal of Chemistry.

[47]  M.A. Lins, R.L. Ricardo, A.C. do Amaral, and A. Kunz, 2020. BIOGAS YIELD AND PRODUCTIVENESS OF SWINE MANURE FOR DIFFERENT REACTOR CONFIGURA TIONS. Engenharia Agricola. 40, pp., 664–673. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v40n6p664-673/2020

[48] C.M. Duong and T.T. Lim, 2025. Interaction between organic loading rate and mesophilic temperature on biogas production and bacterial structure in co-digestion of manure and oil. Biomass and Bioenergy. 203, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108310

[49]  Y. Wang, Y. Li, Y. Qi, et al., 2025. Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Dairy Manure and Cucumber Residues: Methane Production Efficiency and Microbial Community Characteristics. Agronomy. 15, https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15071610

[50]  Z. Hou, J. Zhang, L. Dang, et al., 2023. Correlation Analysis of Microbial Community Changes and Physicochemical Characteristics in Aged Vinegar Brewing. Foods. 12, https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12183430

[51]  S. Cong, Y. Xu, and Y. Lu, 2021. Growth Coordination Between Butyrate-Oxidizing Syntrophs and Hydrogenotrophic Methanogens. Frontiers in Microbiology. 12, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.742531

[52]  J. Struckmann Poulsen, N. de Jonge, W. Vieira Macêdo, et al., 2022. Characterisation of cellulose-degrading organisms in an anaerobic digester. Bioresource Technology. 351, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.126933

[53]  C. Senés-Guerrero, F.A. Colón-Contreras, J.F. Reynoso-Lobo, et al., 2019. Biogas- producing microbial composition of an anaerobic digester and associated bovine residues. MicrobiologyOpen. 8, https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.854

[54]  P. Ghosh, M. Kumar, R. Kapoor, et al., 2020. Enhanced biogas production from municipal solid waste via co-digestion with sewage sludge and metabolic pathway analysis. Bioresource Technology. 296, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122275

[55]  X. Song, C. Zhao, J. Wang, et al., 2021. Hydrothermal Pretreatment to Enhance Anaerobic Digestion of Cow Manure and Its Mechanism[水热预处理强化牛粪厌氧消
化及其机理]. Research of Environmental Sciences. 34, pp., 2256–2263. https://doi.org/10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2021.05.15

[56]  R. Li, S. Chen, and X. Li, 2009. Anaerobic co-digestion of kitchen waste and cattle manure for methane production. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects. 31, pp., 1848–1856. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567030802606038

[57]  J. Mohammed, A.M. Ridha, and M.H. Majeed, 2020. Improved of biogas production by anaerobic co-digestion of Ziziphus leaves and cow manure wastes. International Journal of Design and Nature and Ecodynamics. 15, pp., 239–244. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijdne.150214

[58]  Y.B. López, L.Q. López, and J.M.E. Contreras, 2025. Evaluating the co-digestion of bovine and goat excreta for biogas generation using a tubular biodigester in Valledupar, Cesar. Results in Engineering. 27, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.106588

[59]  R. Alvarez and G. Lidén, 2009. Low temperature anaerobic digestion of mixtures of llama, cow and sheep manure for improved methane production. Biomass and Bioenergy. 33, pp., 527–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.08.012

[60]  L. Song, L. Deng, Y. Yin, X. Pu, and Z. Wang, 2010. Biogas production potential and characteristics of manure of sheep, duck and rabbit under anaerobic digestion. Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering. 26, pp., 277–282. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2010.10.047

[61]  M. Belaid, A.N. Matheri, N.P. Mdluli, and E. Muzenda, 2019. Biochemical methane potential analysis using cow dung, chicken manure and pig manure under mesophilic conditions. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management.

[62]  P. Tsapekos, P.G. Kougias, M. Alvarado-Morales, et al., 2018. Energy recovery from wastewater microalgae through anaerobic digestion process: Methane potential, continuous reactor operation and modelling aspects. Biochemical Engineering Journal. 139, pp., 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2018.08.004

[63]  E. Marañón, L. Castrillón, G. Quiroga, et al., 2012. Co-digestion of cattle manure with food waste and sludge to increase biogas production. Waste Management. 32, pp., 1821– 1825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.05.033

[64]  S. Sawanon, S. Leungprasert, B. Sillapacharoenkul, et al., 2022. Grass as a high potential by-product: Buffalo grass to biogas and the increase of system performance and stability. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 47, pp., 31941–31948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.042

[65]  A.I. Jarwar, A.Q. Laghari, G. Maitlo, et al., 2023. Biological assisted treatment of buffalo dung and poultry manure for biogas generation using laboratory-scale bioreactor. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. 13, pp., 1979–1986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01248-1

[66]  E. Agayev and A. Ugurlu, 2011. Biogas production from co-digestion of horse manure and waste sewage sludge. Technical Proceedings of the 2011 NSTI Nanotechnology Conference and Expo, NSTI-Nanotech 2011.

[67]  M. Lopes, P. Baptista, E. Duarte, and A.L.N. Moreira, 2019. Enhanced biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of pig slurry and horse manure with mechanical pre- treatment. Environmental Technology (United Kingdom). 40, pp., 1289–1297. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2017.1420698

[68]  V. Dubrovskis and I. Plume, 2024. BIOMETHANE PRODUCTION FROM PELLETS OF HORSE MANURE AND LITTER MIXTURE. Engineering for Rural Development. 23, pp., 564–568. https://doi.org/10.22616/ERDev.2024.23.TF105

[69]  P. Mukumba, G. Makaka, S. Mamphweli, V. Xuza, and M. Peacemaker, 2018. Anaerobic digestion: An assessment of the biodegradability of a biogas digester fed with substrates at different mixing ratios. Anaerobic digestion: An assessment of the biodegradability of a biogas digester fed with substrates at different mixing ratios., in: , Waste-to-Energy (WtE)

[70]  J.A. Kriswantoro, C.H. Tseng, F. Fois, et al., 2025. Synergetic Hydrogen and Methane Productions from Anaerobic Digestion of Selected Rural-Farming Plant and Animal- Based Biomass Wastes. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering. 42, pp., 775–790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-024-00294-z

[71]  B.N. Kheira, B. Dadamoussa, A. Bendraoua, M. Mel, and B. Labed, 2017. Effects of co-digestion of camel dung and municipal solid wastes on quality of biogas, methane and biofertilizer production. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences.

[72]  J. Jamaluddin and Z. Zulkeflee, 2023. Co-Digestion of Water Hyacinth and Duck Manure for Potential Low-Cost Biogas Production by Rural Communities. Clean - Soil, Air, Water. 51, https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.202200127

[73]  P. Bres, M.E. Beily, B.J. Young, et al., 2018. Performance of semi-continuous anaerobic co-digestion of poultry manure with fruit and vegetable waste and analysis of digestate quality: A bench scale study. Waste Management. 82, pp., 276–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.10.041

[74]  F.A. Shah, N. Rashid, Q. Mahmood, and A. Ali, 2019. Effect of Pretreatment and Substrate Ratios in Biorefinery Employing Co-digestion of Plant Biomass and Poultry Waste. Frontiers in Energy Research. 6, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2018.00143

[75]  A.M. Saravanan, G. Al Mamari, G. Patil, et al., 2023. Experimental scrutinization on production of biogas from vegetable and animal waste. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2690, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0120661

[76]  S. Bist, R. Nepal, T. Regmi, and R.K. Sharma, 2024. Poultry slaughterhouse waste management through anaerobic digestion with varying proportions of chicken litter. Environmental Challenges. 17, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2024.101035

[77]  S. Mothe, K. Bella, M.J. Sukesh, et al., 2024. Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Rice Straw with Ternary Mixtures for Enhanced Methane Production. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research. 14, pp., 203–215. https://doi.org/10.20508/ijrer.v14i1.13780.g8881

[78]  H.Y. Kok, M.R. Shamsuddin, and A. Aqsha, 2020. Anaerobic treatment of chicken manure co-digested with sawdust. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. pp., 741– 748. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5753-8_69

[79]  A.N. Muske and P. Venkateswara Rao, 2018. Evaluation of Biogas Production Potential by Anaerobic Co-digestion with Substrate Mixture of Fruit Waste, Lawn Grass, and Manures. Evaluation of Biogas Production Potential by Anaerobic Co-digestion with Substrate Mixture of Fruit Waste, Lawn Grass, and Manures., in: , Water Resources and Environmental Engineering II: Climate and Environment, Springer Science+Business Media, pp., 91–99https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2038-5_9

[80]  J. Xu, A.M. Mustafa, and K. Sheng, 2017. Effects of inoculum to substrate ratio and co- digestion with bagasse on biogas production of fish waste. Environmental Technology (United Kingdom). 38, pp., 2517–2522. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2016.1269837

[81]  G. Nahar, A. Koley, S. Garai, S. Balachandran, and A.B. Ross, 2024. Enhancing Biogas Production Through the Co-Digestion of Fish Waste (FW) and Water Hyacinth (WH) Using Cow Dung as an Inoculum: Effect of FW/WH Ratio. Applied Sciences (Switzerland). 14, https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219880

[82]  N. Mpokera, J. Gervas, L. Mtashobya, and J. Emmanuel, 2025. Valorization of Nile perch wastes and cow rumen cud for biogas production through anaerobic co-digestion. Biofuels. https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2025.2473785

[83]  R. Netshivhumbe, F. Faloye, A. Tolessa, J. Görgens, and N. Goosen, 2024. Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Fish Sludge Originating from a Recirculating Aquaculture System. Waste and Biomass Valorization. 15, pp., 5589–5605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649- 024-02569-2

[84]  T.S. Nam, H. Van Thao, H.C. Khanh, et al., 2022. Lab-scale biogas production from co- digestion of super-intensive shrimp sludge and potential biomass feedstocks. Journal of Energy Systems. 6, pp., 131–142. https://doi.org/10.30521/jes.973569

[85]  P. Srivichai and O. Chavalparit, 2020. Co-digestion of modified tapioca starch sludge and shrimp pond sediment as a method to improve system stability and biogas production. ScienceAsia. 46, pp., 119–127. https://doi.org/10.2306/SCIENCEASIA1513-1874.2020.017

[86]  N. Duan, D. Zhang, B. Khoshnevisan, et al., 2020. Human waste anaerobic digestion as a promising low-carbon strategy: Operating performance, microbial dynamics and environmental footprint. Journal of Cleaner Production. 256, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120414

[87]  R. Liu, X. Li, S. Chen, et al., 2012. Performance of anaerobic co-digestion of human manure and wheat straw. Tongji Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Tongji University. 40, https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0253-374x.2012.s2.012

[88]  U.N. Kemka, T.E. Ogbulie, K. Oguzie, C.O. Akalezi, and E.E. Oguzie, 2024. Impact of substrate heterogeneity on anaerobic co-digestion process: a review. EQA. 62, pp., 18– 34. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2281-4485/18498

[89]  F.N. Luiz, E. de C. Lourenço, G.P. Gomes, and M.R. Becker, 2025. Optimization of the startup phase of semi-continuous biogas reactors through co-digestion of Organic Solid Waste (OSW). Environmental Technology (United Kingdom). https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2025.2548634

[90]  D. Georgiou, V. Diamantis, and A. Aivasidis, 2024. Scale-up of plug-flow reactors in anaerobic treatment of agro-industrial wastes. Biochemical Engineering Journal. 210, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2024.109437

[91]  K. Kumar V, R. Mahendiran, P. Subramanian, and S. Karthikeyan, 2024. Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactors for Bio-methane production from limed tannery fleshings: Lab and pilot scale reactors. Sustainable Chemistry One World. 2, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scowo.2024.100006

[92]  Y. Zhan, X. Cao, Y. Xiao, et al., 2022. Start-up of co-digestion of poultry litter and wheat straw in anaerobic sequencing batch reactor by gradually increasing organic loading rate: Methane production and microbial community analysis. Bioresource Technology. 354, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127232

[93]  W.W. Yang, X.Y. Tang, X. Ma, X.E. Cao, and Y.L. He, 2025. Synergistic intensification of palladium-based membrane reactors for hydrogen production: A review. Energy Conversion and Management. 325, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119424
doi.org/10.19184/jobc.v6.i1.60002

Prasiefa, M. G., & Ali, M. N. Journal of Biobased Chemicals (2026) 6: 22–46 Page 46

[94]  L. Niero, F. Morgan-Sagastume, M. Pelkonen, and A. Lagerkvist, 2024. Short hydraulic retention time in methane production from sewage sludge hydrolysate using anaerobic moving-bed biofilm reactors (AnMBBR) under thermophilic and mesophilic conditions. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2024.113766

[95]  L. Feng, R. Wahid, A.J. Ward, and H.B. Møller, 2017. Anaerobic co-digestion of cattle manure and meadow grass: Effect of serial configurations of continuous stirred tank reactors (CSTRs). Biosystems Engineering. 160, pp., 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.05.002

[96]  T.M. Cabrita and M.T. Santos, 2023. Biochemical Methane Potential Assays for Organic Wastes as an Anaerobic Digestion Feedstock. Sustainability (Switzerland). 15, https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511573

[97]  D. Foppiano, M. Tarik, J. Schneebeli, et al., 2020. Siloxane compounds in biogas from manure and mixed organic waste: Method development and speciation analysis with GC- ICP-MS. Talanta. 208, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120398

[98]  F. Arifan, A. Abdullah, and S. Sumardiono, 2021. Kinetic study of biogas production from animal manure and organic waste in Semarang city by using anaerobic digestion method. Indonesian Journal of Chemistry. 21, pp., 1221–1230. https://doi.org/10.22146/IJC.65056

[99] P. de Souza Almeida, C.A. de Menezes, W. de Araújo Cavalcante, et al., 2024. Mesophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Fruit and Vegetable Waste: Single-Versus Two- Stage Reactor, and Modeling of the Liquid and Solid Fractions of the Residue. Industrial Biotechnology. 20, pp., 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1089/ind.2024.0007

[100] A.A.S.M. Magomnang, R.J. Varela, D.M.M. Asinero, et al., 2024. Enhancing Biogas Purification Efficiency Through Microbial Intervention: A Comparative Analysis of Carbon Dioxide and Hydrogen Sulfide Removal in Anaerobic Digestion Systems. Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Sustainable Energy: Energy Transition and Net-Zero Climate Future, ICUE 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUE63019.2024.10795527